Measuring Discomfort from Glare: Recommendations for Good Practice

Leukos Thumbnail

September 7, 2021

S. Fotios , M. Kent

This article presents a review of the methods used for subjective evaluation of discomfort from glare, focusing on the two procedures most frequently used in past research – adjustment and category rating. Evidence is presented to demonstrate that some aspects of these procedures influence the evaluation, such as the range of glare source luminances available in an adjustment procedure, leading to biased evaluations and which hence reduce the reliability and validity of the data. The article offers recommendations for good practice when using these procedures and also suggests alternative methods that might be explored in further work.

Go HERE for the full article.

S. Fotios & M. Kent (2020) Measuring Discomfort from Glare: Recommendations for Good Practice, LEUKOS, DOI: 10.1080/15502724.2020.1803082

Related Articles


Latest Articles

  • DesignLights Consortium’s 2024 Controls Summit: a Collaborative Event for Advancing Energy Efficiency

    Early Bird registration is still open until 9/15 for the DesignLights Consortium’s (DLC) 1.5-day Controls Summit taking place October 15-16 at The Westin Hotel in Milwaukee. “Integration for the Future” is the theme of this year’s Summit. The goal is to work toward eliminating barriers to wider adoption of lighting controls and HVAC integration in… Read More…

  • Insensitive Language Undermines Lighting Review

    The author, Jeffrey Dross, criticizes The New York Times’ Wirecutter feature for using a rude, possibly sexist term in their lighting review headline. He finds the term inappropriate and unprofessional, especially in an industry where respect for the audience, many of whom are female professionals, is crucial. While the product itself is outdated, the insensitive… Read More…